<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Avid Web Developer</title>
	<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com</link>
	<description>When in doubt, blog it out!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand New Portfolio Website by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2008/09/23/brand-new-portfolio-website/#comment-278</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2008/09/23/brand-new-portfolio-website/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Right you are Sam. Good eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are Sam. Good eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand New Portfolio Website by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2008/09/23/brand-new-portfolio-website/#comment-277</link>
		<author>Sam</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2008/09/23/brand-new-portfolio-website/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Don't mean to be acting as QA here, but I think the link to your portfolio above is broken...(it's missing an 'e')</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t mean to be acting as QA here, but I think the link to your portfolio above is broken&#8230;(it&#8217;s missing an &#8216;e&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fake Magic Trick - So fake it&#8217;s real! by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-265</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Hello Tina.

It's quite simple. It's just a math formula. All it comes down to is your number, with the formula, ending up to be a multiple number of 9. And it's also flash. Choose the number 9 each time...look at the other symbols that are multiples of 9...so 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 81. They're all the same symbol.

They add in all those other ones to confuse you, and the change it up to string you along with the illusion.

&lt;a href="http://www.nicksimonsen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/math-forumla.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Click here to see what I mean...&lt;/a&gt;



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tina.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite simple. It&#8217;s just a math formula. All it comes down to is your number, with the formula, ending up to be a multiple number of 9. And it&#8217;s also flash. Choose the number 9 each time&#8230;look at the other symbols that are multiples of 9&#8230;so 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 81. They&#8217;re all the same symbol.</p>
<p>They add in all those other ones to confuse you, and the change it up to string you along with the illusion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nicksimonsen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/math-forumla.jpg" rel="nofollow">Click here to see what I mean&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fake Magic Trick - So fake it&#8217;s real! by Tina</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-264</link>
		<author>Tina</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>OK!  Now that you have explained this trick I feel really stupid!  LOL!  Now if you can only explain how this one works:

http://www.milaadesign.com/wizardy.swf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK!  Now that you have explained this trick I feel really stupid!  LOL!  Now if you can only explain how this one works:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.milaadesign.com/wizardy.swf" rel="nofollow">http://www.milaadesign.com/wizardy.swf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fake Magic Trick - So fake it&#8217;s real! by Jim Mirkalami</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-263</link>
		<author>Jim Mirkalami</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/04/27/fake-magic-trick-so-fake-its-real/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>I have been visiting this site a lot lately, so i thought it is a good idea to show my appreciation with a comment.

Thanks,
Jim Mirkalami</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been visiting this site a lot lately, so i thought it is a good idea to show my appreciation with a comment.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jim Mirkalami</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tokyo&#8217;s Ark by Chris G</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-254</link>
		<author>Chris G</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Give vista a spin when you get the chance, I've been running it the past week at work and no issues so far. Mind you, no gaming either so we'll see how that one goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give vista a spin when you get the chance, I&#8217;ve been running it the past week at work and no issues so far. Mind you, no gaming either so we&#8217;ll see how that one goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tokyo&#8217;s Ark by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-253</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>lol.

Sorry, totally slipped my mind. I'd like to thank Chris for helping me save $1000 by suggesting to swap out the hard drive instead of buying a new laptop.

Everything is back up now. I'm sticking with XP until the very last minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol.</p>
<p>Sorry, totally slipped my mind. I&#8217;d like to thank Chris for helping me save $1000 by suggesting to swap out the hard drive instead of buying a new laptop.</p>
<p>Everything is back up now. I&#8217;m sticking with XP until the very last minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tokyo&#8217;s Ark by Chris G</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-252</link>
		<author>Chris G</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/10/03/tokyos-ark/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>What? No credit for the memx tip? Nick, that hurts :P hope everything goes well with your swap, they can be a total bitch when the drive starts to fail. I bought a Seagate FreeAgent 160, works awesome for a portable drive and its pretty to boot.

What OS is going back on when you reinstall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? No credit for the memx tip? Nick, that hurts <img src='http://www.nicksimonsen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> hope everything goes well with your swap, they can be a total bitch when the drive starts to fail. I bought a Seagate FreeAgent 160, works awesome for a portable drive and its pretty to boot.</p>
<p>What OS is going back on when you reinstall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The mother of all cameras&#8230; by Ian Woo</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/09/18/the-mother-of-all-cameras/#comment-234</link>
		<author>Ian Woo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/09/18/the-mother-of-all-cameras/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, I know I already replied to you once but this is for Sam's benefit too if he reads it.

7240x5433 is the size from the 39.3 mp camera used for the first Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week New York campaign. The camera was a Phase One P45  digital back, and it starts at about $29-30,000! (You can rent one from VisTek here in Calgary) If you want to see an image from that at 100% let me know.

The dimensions don't really seem too huge, but think of it this way: if you add just one px to each side to that image, you need another 12,675 pixels. So you get diminishing returns in width and height with higher and higher megapixels. Now... really good glass makes a huge difference in how crisp that image is. And it's scary how much THOSE cost. Then again, the Hubble has cost about $5 billion by now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, I know I already replied to you once but this is for Sam&#8217;s benefit too if he reads it.</p>
<p>7240&#215;5433 is the size from the 39.3 mp camera used for the first Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week New York campaign. The camera was a Phase One P45  digital back, and it starts at about $29-30,000! (You can rent one from VisTek here in Calgary) If you want to see an image from that at 100% let me know.</p>
<p>The dimensions don&#8217;t really seem too huge, but think of it this way: if you add just one px to each side to that image, you need another 12,675 pixels. So you get diminishing returns in width and height with higher and higher megapixels. Now&#8230; really good glass makes a huge difference in how crisp that image is. And it&#8217;s scary how much THOSE cost. Then again, the Hubble has cost about $5 billion by now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The mother of all cameras&#8230; by Sam Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/09/18/the-mother-of-all-cameras/#comment-233</link>
		<author>Sam Lu</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nicksimonsen.com/2007/09/18/the-mother-of-all-cameras/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>That camera and &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/24/big-red-one-digicam-that-is-debuts-at-nab/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this camcorder&lt;/a&gt; should make babies.

But seriously, how large of a resolution photo can you achieve with 39 megapixels? That seems excessive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That camera and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/24/big-red-one-digicam-that-is-debuts-at-nab/" rel="nofollow">this camcorder</a> should make babies.</p>
<p>But seriously, how large of a resolution photo can you achieve with 39 megapixels? That seems excessive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
